|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
120
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 16:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
So i get decloaked and killed while i walk the dog, take a crap or have a cigarette break? No thanks.
|
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
120
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 16:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Behr Oroo wrote:Log off, dock up
Why don't you log off or dock up if a cloaked ship bothers you that much?
Quote:but if you are AFK you run the risk of being blown up. It happens in EVERY SHIP.
Nope. Never had that problem in a cloaky ship. And that's one of the reasons to fit a cloak in the first place. I pay for this convenience with lower dps and tank. So it's all fair.
|
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
120
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 17:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tecate wrote:CCP wants more interaction and combat. Your not doing either. Either play or logoff. AFK Cloaky sitting is not playing.
You guys are like players screaming for ban of margin trading skill because of margin scams. Me having a short cigarette break is not the same as someone afk cloaking in a system 23/7 for days and weeks. You want the later removed from the game then come up with ideas that only adresses that issue and not some bull that makes life harder for everyone else using a cloak.
It's not unfair to anyone that i can take a short cloaked afk break when i'm operating deep in hostile territory with no stations to dock. And btw your presence in local might annoy me just as much as my presence annoys you but you don't see me asking for an easy button to remove others from the system so i can go on with my business undisturbed. It's all fair as it is. |
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
122
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 17:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tecate wrote:We are not asking for a easy button. We are asking for a way to catch you.
You can catch me when i'm uncloaked just like i can catch you when i'm uncloaked.
What you are asking for is an imbalance to the detriment of pilots in cloaked ships, which as i've pointed out already pay for their cloak ability with lower stats in other aspects of their ship.
Your idea would come off intellectualy honest at least if it included a buff to cloaking in other aspects as a trade off to this proposed nerf. |
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
125
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 19:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Behr Oroo wrote:What type of buff would you suggest? You already have a good thing going with the current cloak setup.
I dont see the imbalance you are speaking of. If you truly think that youre cloaky ship is weaker than the average ship, then I think youre just arguing for the sake of arguing.
Look, when is the last time you sat solo in a system, not in a fleet just looking for your own solo kill? I would guess it's not all that often and if you are, I highly doubt it's in a bomber. It's probably a cloaky tengu or loki and if your crying that these ships are under powered, then I dont know what to tell you.
Why do you assume that all stealthy ships are pvp fittet hunters? That couldn't be further from the truth. Cloak is for many ships the only defense against other players. That even holds true for pve fittet SB'ers and T3's. So when you want to nerf this form of defense then it would be reasonable to buff other form of defense as a trade off, for instance half decent tank on stealth bombers. |
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
127
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 00:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tecate it seems to me you have a problem with stealth boats in general, not just afk cloakers. Am i correct? |
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
133
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 16:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Behr Oroo wrote:I havent suggested a nerf to cloak. Cloak would stay the same.
In what world are you living in? Of course it's a nerf to cloaking. The implications of your idea go well beyond dealing with afk cloakers. |
|
|
|